Extra Increment case came
up today which was numbered at 43.
DOT lawyer was not available. It appeared that he had asked BSNL lawyer to attend in his absence if the case came up.
Our lawyer left his junior because he had to attend a
case in HC. He also informed Com N K
Srinivasan who worked in our department earlier and now a practicing lawyer to
take care of the case for Passover to argue in the afternoon . Since DOT lawyer
was absent , pass over was not possible and automatically would be adjourned .
When the case came up BSNL lawyer wanted adjournment
as the clarification asked from DOT was not received. Since stay was there, they were already enjoying and nothing was going to happen. The judges asked whether
there was a stay from Supreme Court ?
NKS told that since there is Ernakulam HC judgement
there is no need to further delay the case.
Both the judges asked BSNL lawyer whether this case is
similar to that case for which that lawyer replied "Yes".
If it's so then what is the problem? Judges asked.
Then Judges gave the directive to both sides as "Petitioners should submit a memo incorporating the
points that the case is similar to the case of Ernakulam HC case."
Similarly Respondents should submit a memo
incorporating the points that it is dissimilar.
We shall hear the case and decide on 7/11/19 judges
pronounced.
But Com NKS tried to advance the date but judges told
that there are many holidays in between and hence not possible to prepone.
Today Com Sukumaran, CHQ VP, Com Kalidasan, our Treasurer and myself attended the court
RV.
Circle Secretary
No comments:
Post a Comment